Archive for December, 2007

Mediasnoops’ 2008 predictions

December 31, 2007

Well 2007 is nearly over and 2008 is almost upon us. Here’s what we
think could happen in 2008.

JANUARY: The government cave in to Mediawatch UK’s demand to extend
laws banning violent porn to all R18 rated material. Mediawatch UK
then start up a campaign to extend laws to anything with the
slightest wiff of sex in it including pop music videos with flashes
of nipples and bare buttocks and have anyone caught in possesion of
such filth thrown in jail for three years.

FEBRUARY: Supermarkets and other high street stores finally put lads
mags on the top shelf. Charliegrrl and Object start a crusade to
eliminate all men over 6ft tall because they are obviously all
misogynistic dirty readers of pornographic lads mags.

MARCH: Kieth Vaz to declare in Parliament that all video games
featuring anything more than fluffy bunny rabits, Mario and Sonic
should be classified as extremly violent and morally corrupting and
banned.

APRIL: Kieth Vaz joins the campaign of two parents to ban all Super
Mario Brothers games after their broke his leg after trying to do a
super jump over a wall after eating what he believed was a magic
mushroom.

MAY: Soap operas appease the anti-booze health police after showing
all their characters miserable as fuck after having just one drink
down their local.

JUNE: Euro 2008 begins but with England absent the anti-booze health
nannies miss a chance to try and arm wrestle the government into
more scaremongering about binge drinking.

JULY: Christian Voice again try and take the BBC to court for
blasphemy over an episode of Doctor Who where Jesus and the Doctor’s
chum Captain Jack have a gay kiss.

AUGUST: The health police celebrate as Ofcom agree to ban all
adverts for junk food before 9pm. They are so happy they go “ahh
fuck it” and chow down on McDonalds, KFC and Pukka Pies.

SEPTEMBER: Big Brother in trouble over yet another racist incident.
John Beyer is asked to comment but says he’s more concerned about
the flash of butt cheek he saw in the shower.

OCTOBER: It’s horror movie season and the latest slasher fest Saw 10
causes Daily Mail critic Christopher Tookey to choke on his self
appointed moral guardian popcorn and drop dead. He later returns
from the dead as a vengeful spirit and murders every member of the
BBFC board for allowing “sick corrupting society destroying filth”
to pass.

NOVEMBER: It’s a quite month for the self appointed moral guardians
so they go and do something worthwhile with their lives. Some
charity work, helping the aged and some gardening. Who would have
thought eh?

DECEMBER: With Christmas around the corner the ASA finally ban all
booze adverts as they agree with the health police that people just
cannot be trusted to see such adverts without wanting to go out and
get absoloutly drunk as a skunk. People rush like mad to snap up
booze for Christmas as fast as possible before the government slaps
a 50% hike on prices in the name of combatting binge drinking. Later
there is riots as prohibition is brought in and the anti-booze
nanies sit on high laughing their smug heads off.

Ofcom bovvard about Catherine Tate Xmas special complaints

December 28, 2007

The show was broadcast at 10.30 so what’s the fuss? If young children were watching then that’s their parents responsbility.
Ofcom is obviously rushing to investigate every single complaint after the furore over the TV phone ins rip off scandel in order to keep the tabloid media quiet.
What a fucccccccccccccking liberty!

From The Times courtesy of the Melon Farmers:

Ofcom to probe Catherine Tate Christmas special

Adam Sherwin, Media Correspondent

Watchdogs will launch an inquiry into Catherine Tate’s comedy special after complaints by viewers that it was the most offensive programme ever broadcast by the BBC on a Christmas Day.

Viewers complained of excessive use of the “f-word” by Tate’s foul-mouthed character Nan. A sketch depicting a Northern Irish family as terrorists prompted accusations of bigotry.

The sketch show attracted 6.4 million viewers to BBC One at 10:30pm on Christmas night. The BBC defended the show, describing Tate as a comedy genius. But Ofcom said it would examine the programme after receiving complaints about offensive language. The inquiry will ask whether the programme was appropriate for Christmas night, when many children would be watching.

Viewers complained that the programme, which followed the more placid To The Manor Born, began with an avalanche of swearing from Nan Taylor. Kathy Burke, playing her daughter, embarked upon a swearing competition with Nan.

The representation of a family in Northern Ireland receiving Christmas presents attracted complaints that Tate was exploiting lazy stereotypes. The grandmother opens her present to find a balaclava, which she puts over her head. Her husband receives a knuckleduster which he excitedly uses to punch a chair. The mother’s gift is an apron with a balaclava-clad terrorist and the words “Remember Everything, Forgive Nothing”. A gay son is handed a chocolate penis.

One viewer wrote on the BBC online message board: “What had the contents of this to do with Christmas? Crude language just for the sake of it – and being repeated time and time again.” Another commented: “Maybe the lowest point for BBC One on Christmas Day… ever.”

Ms Tate admitted that the language might have got out of hand. “I don’t know how this Christmas special got so depraved because it isn’t what I set out to do,” she told Radio Times. The sketch between Nan and her daughter required a “climactic aspect when you’re topping each other” with greater feats of swearing.

A spokesman for the BBC said: “Catherine Tate creates characters who are so over the top as to be almost cartoon-like and this is where her genius lies. Her comedy is never meant to offend any viewer and is always based on satire and grotesque exaggeration.” The Nan character’s foul language was “fundamental to what makes her funny” and the show was preceded by a warning that it contained strong language. The BBC received about 100 complaints through telephone and internet message boards.

Tate, 39, was nominated for an Emmy and won a British Comedy Award for her show, which began on BBC Two. She has no plans to make a further series and said that she wanted to retire the show before the characters got stale. She will revive her role as David Tennant’s assistant in the next series of Doctor Who.

A spokesman for Ofcom said: “We have received complaints about offensive language and content in the Catherine Tate Christmas Show and we will look into the matter.”

Tate showed her determination to move on by sending her most famous creation, Lauren, the schoolgirl whose catchphrase was “Am I bovvered?”, in the special episode, on a fatal canoeing trip.
We notice Beyer hasen’t made any comment yet. Blimey he must be still stuffed with mince pies to pass up the opporunity to honk on such a big bandwagon.

As for the people who complained it seems their personal offence about the swearing in the show has turned to mock moral concern for children.

Ofcom really need to question whether 100 complaints warrents an investigation at all.
 

Spotting Beyer: Johnny Boy on FIVE’s Most Shocking Celeb Moments

December 28, 2007

Maybe we should make this a regular thing. Whenever Beyer pops up on TV
to pont off on shows about shocking and controversial things in the
media.

Mediasnoops spotted Johnny Boy on FIVE’s Most Shocking Celeb Moments of
The Noughties last night. He was making comment on The Sun’s
infamous “BONKERS BRUNO” headline when Frank Bruno had a mental
breakdown.

As usual the irony of appearing on a programme full of smut and filth
passes Beyer right over his head.

But then again maybe he can see the irony but the salivating prospect
of more free publicity is too much for him to pass by.

Mediasnoops Christmas List 2007

December 24, 2007

1.Copies of FHM, Loaded, Maxim, Nuts and GQ for charliegrrl so she
can burn them whilst dancing around and shouting “PICTURES OF WOMEN
IN SKIMPI CLOTHING IS RAPE!!!”

2.A list of all the planned TV programmes over the coming year that
feature explicit sex, nudity, bad language and violence for John
Beyer so he can complain to the Daily Mail about them in advance.

3.A time machine for Stephen Green so he can go back to the days when
people were burned at the stake for blasphemy.

4.Books about the “good old days” of prohibition USA for Alcohol
Concern.

5.Ping Pong video game for Kieth Vaz’s kids. After all that’s the
only game that he thinks is safe for kids to play. Oh hang on a
minute it might encourage children to thwack each other with small
batons. It must be banned now before any kids get hurt!

Merry Christmas from Mediasnoops.

Tabloid shit stirring over Doctor Who’s “Messiah”

December 21, 2007

“Doctor Who is in trouble with Christian groups this Christmas – for
suggesting the Time Lord is a second Messiah.”
Nah. Doctor Who is in trouble with rent-a-quote seeking Stephen Green after a shitty
free newspaper like the Metro told him a load of bollox about it
taking the piss out of his religon.

From the Metro:

Doctor Who hit by religious outcry
Friday, December 21, 2007

Doctor Who is in trouble with Christian groups this Christmas – for
suggesting the Time Lord is a second Messiah.

The centrepiece of the BBC’s Christmas Day schedules has been
criticised for allegedly subverting religious imagery.

The festive special, Voyage Of The Damned, shows David Tennant’s
character saving a futuristic Titanic from a meteorite storm.

The episode, also featuring Kylie Minogue, shows the Doctor
persuading passengers of his magic powers – with the aid of two
robotic angels.

Writer and executive producer Russell T Davies said: “The series
lends itself to religious iconography because the Doctor is a proper
saviour.

“He saves the world through the power of his mind and passion.”

But evangelical group Christian Voice, which previously complained
about alleged blasphemy in BBC broadcast Jerry Springer: The Opera,
is not amused again.

Christian Voice director Stephen Green said: “The Doctor would have
to do a lot more than the usual prancing around to be a messiah.

“He has to save people from their sins.”

Green must be hoping this will give him another platform to try and
relaunch his blasphemy prosecution campaign against the BBC which
fell flat on it’s sorry ass a few weeks ago.
Sorry Green mate but the judge’s have already shouted EXTERMINATE
EXTERMINATE!!!
Lol!

By the way this year’s Xmas special of Doctor Who looks fab and we
can’t wait to see the Doctor and Kylie Minogue battling evil aliens
on the Titanic. Great stuff!

Beyer joins crusade against pollouting Nintendo Wii

December 21, 2007

From Mediawatch UK:

The Carbon cost of Christmas and how to beat it 15/12/07

The Carbon cost of Christmas: and how to beat it

A time of peace on earth and goodwill to all mankind, Christmas has
also become a frenzy of mass consumption. And, as new calculations
from the new economics foundation reveal, our obsession with high-
tech energy guzzling gadgets threatens both to derail attempts to cut
emissions, and erode our well-being.

But, nef researchers say, low carbon highs hold the key to reducing
emissions and creating real festive cheer. Having calculated some of
the carbon cost of Christmas, researchers at nef, an award winning
independent `think-and-do’ tank have devised a climate friendly
Christmas that also increases people’s well-being.

Market analysts estimate that around 60 percent of annual turnover in
UK retailing happens during the Christmas period. In its briefing –
The Carbon Cost of Christmas – the think tank exposes some of the
biggest seasonal `no no’s this Christmas, followed by some big
Christmas `yes, yeses.’

For example, this year, Christmas sparkle comes all the way from
China:

Well over eight out of ten Christmas decorations we import this year
will come from China – in all a record 66,500 tonnes. Things produced
in China generally pump more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere,
because China’s energy mix contains much more carbon. But even that
excludes the carbon cost of shipping them half the way around the
world to the UK.
And just two of the gadgets topping Christmas wish lists this year
reveal the increasing carbon cost of our obsession with high tech
just at the point at which we should be reducing emissions:

Energy consumed by Nintendo Wii games consols in the UK for the year
up to Christmas is estimated to generate the equivalent in greenhouse
gases of 180,000 single flights from the UK to New York[i] The CO2e
emissions produced by each consol– just one household electrical
device – using its Wiiconnect24 stand-by facility, assuming a modest
14 hours playing per week, over the course of a year is greater than,
or equal to, the total annual carbon dioxide emissions per person in
countries such as Burundi or Chad.

Speeking today John Beyer, director of Mediawatch-uk agreed with the
New Economics Foundation and highlighted that the damage the Nintendo
Wii does to society’s morals is just as bad as the damage it is doing
to the environment. “This console is filling our children’s minds
with evil violent filth and it’s little wonder we have kids stabbing
and shooting each other when the Nintendo Wii is able to polloute
their brains the same way it polloutes the planet”
Mediawatch UK have joined forces with green groups in calling for a
huge tax on the Nintendo Wii to stop it killing polar bears and
turning children into crazed violent psycopaths.

Merry Christmas

Manhunt 2 ban: Rockstar win appeal

December 13, 2007

Now the BBFC must ask whether their decision to ban Manhunt 2 was
based on actual evidence of potential harm or knee jerk reaction
based on tabloid hype and pressure from agenda driven politicians
and also the parents of Stephen Pakeerah.

From the BBC:

Manhunt 2 title wins ban appeal

The developer of Manhunt 2 has won its appeal to force the British
Board of Film Classification to look again at its ban on the game’s
release.
The game has twice been rejected by the BBFC for certification,
effectively banning the game for sale in the UK.

Developers Rockstar contested the ban at the Video Appeals
Committee, which ruled in the firm’s favour.

The game could now go on sale, if the BBFC, which is “considering
the judgement”, takes no further action.

In a statement, Rockstar said: “We are committed to making great
interactive entertainment, while also marketing our products
responsibly and supporting an effective rating system.

“We are pleased that the decision of the VAC has recognised that
Manhunt 2 is well within the bounds established by other 18+ rated
entertainment.”

David Cooke, director of the BBFC, said the body “exercised great
vigilance and care in ensuring that all violent games which are
submitted to us are correctly classified”.

He said the body had twice rejected the game “for its focus on
varied and cumulative killings”.

‘Serious step’

He added: “We recognse that rejection is a very serious step, in
which the desire of publishers to market their games, and that of
gamers to buy them, must be balanced against the public interest.”

He said the judgement had to include the “full range of possible
harm risks to vulnerable individuals and to any children who may be
wrongly exposed to such games.”

“Such balancing judgements are inevitably complex and multi-faceted,
and are made only after very careful consideration of the contents
of a work,” he added.

He said the BBFC had played Manhunt 2 for “well over 30 hours prior
to our decision”.

Food companies agree to stop ads for under 12s

December 13, 2007

This won’t appease the health police who want a blanket ban to FORCE
food companies to stop advertising to children.

From the Guardian:

Food companies sign EU ad pledge

Mark Sweney Guardian Unlimited, Tuesday December 11 2007 An alliance
of food companies including Coca-Cola, Nestlé, Mars and Burger King
have signed a European Union pledge to stop marketing junk food to
children under 12 years old.

The group of 11 companies, which represent more than 50% of the food
and beverage advertising spend in the EU, have agreed to stop
running junk food ads on TV, in print and on the internet to under-
12s by the end of 2008.

The alliance, which also includes PepsiCo, Kraft, Unilever, Danone
and Ferrero, have agreed not to market products in primary schools,
except where “specifically requested by or agreed with the school
administration for educational purposes”.

A number of the companies, such as Coca-Cola, Kraft and Mars, have
previously agreed a US responsible marketing code around advertising
to children.

The difference with this new programme, called the EU Pledge, is
that the 11 companies have agreed to have independently verified
monitoring of their reduction in marketing, from January 2009.

“This is just part of the industry’s response,” said Stephan Loerke,
the managing director of the World Federation of Advertisers.

“We have worked with the (European) commission and other
stakeholders in identifying a best practice model of self-
regulation, have reinforced codes of conduct and are providing
children with the tools to help them understand and interpret
advertising so that they are able to make informed choices”.

The “common commitment” forms part of the EU pledge, that ties into
an EU initiative on diet, physical activity and health set up in
2005 by Markos Kyprianou, the EU health and consumer protection
commissioner.

These companies are doing this through fear of more regulation and
more bans.

US moral guardians blame media for Omaha tragedy

December 11, 2007

It was more than likely that groups like Morality In The Media would
exploit the terrible tragedy in Omaha for their own moral and
political ends.

From Morality In The Media via Mediawatch UK (so we can assume Beyer
and co share Morality’s views that the media is to blame for this
latest American mass murder):

With so many mass murders by individuals, perhaps there is a common
explanation, like popular culture, says Morality in Media President
Robert Peters

NEWS RELEASE from MORALITY IN MEDIA, Inc.

NEW YORK (December 10, 2007) – Morality in Media President Robert
Peters had the following comments in response to latest mass murder
in Omaha:

“What might be called `mass murder by individuals’ is, of course,
not a new phenomena in human history. What is new in the United
States is the regularity with which it now takes place. As noted by
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, mass murder by individuals
includes `killers of family, of coworkers, of students, and of
random strangers.’

“Many place the primary blame on the availability of guns, and there
is no doubt that guns are the weapon of choice of most individual
mass murderers. But in many parts of our nation, guns have always
been readily available, unaccompanied by mass murder by anyone.

“Guns are also the weapon of choice in the entertainment media,
which includes films, TV programs, rap lyrics and video games. A
week never goes by that I don’t see at least one advertisement for a
film or TV program or videogame that prominently depicts one or more
individuals who are carrying, pointing or shooting one or more guns.

“Use of guns in the media, of course, is not a new phenomena. In the
1950s and 1960s, guns were popular in both films and TV programs
that depicted war, the Wild West, police work and a wide variety of
heinous crimes, including organized crime.

“Back then, however, there were standards that guided how violence
was depicted in the media. For example, among the film industry Hays
Code provisions was one that regulated the depiction of murder.
Murder was to be presented in a way that would not inspire
imitation. Brutal killings were not to be presented in detail.
Revenge was not to be justified.

“I recall reading that the TV program `Untouchables’ broke new
ground in depicting deadly violence, but I don’t recall anyone
wanting to be Al Capone. Kids wanted to be G-Men.

“America also had what some call a `civil religion’ that taught and
reinforced at all levels of society a simple commandment, `You shall
not commit murder.’ “Today, films and other media glamorize murder
and revenge and present it in the most detailed, sadistic manner
possible. More often than not, media also portrays religion in a
negative light.

“Problems at home, problems at school, problems at work, problems
with girl and boyfriends, difficulty getting along with other people
in general and mental illness are nothing new, and cannot be the
primary explanation for mass murders by so many minors and adults.

“Parents, schools, religious institutions and government have all
changed over the decades, but none are saying that it is OK to kill
because you have been wronged or are unhappy.

“Only in the entertainment media is the worst of human behavior
depicted `non-judgmentally’ or even worse, glamorized and promoted.

“There is a saying, `You reap what you sow,’ and the American people
are reaping what the entertainment media have sowed and we have
bought for more than forty years.”

Based in New York City, Morality in Media works to promote standards
of decency in media.

“Many place the primary blame on the availability of guns, and there
is no doubt that guns are the weapon of choice of most individual
mass murderers. But in many parts of our nation, guns have always
been readily available, unaccompanied by mass murder by anyone.
Guns are also the weapon of choice in the entertainment media, which
includes films, TV programs, rap lyrics and video games. A week
never goes by that I don’t see at least one advertisement for a film
or TV program or videogame that prominently depicts one or more
individuals who are carrying, pointing or shooting one or more guns.”

So in other words gun ownership is not to blame but instead
the “evil” and “corrupting” influence of the media.
Well of course Morality In The Media and other groups like them
would take that view because they are supported largely by
Republicans who fight to uphold the “rights” of middle Americans to
own guns and blow the fuck away of any “undesirables” (usually black
people) who set one little toe on their front lawns.
Gun ownership supporting Republicans have been diverting the blame
for mass murder from gun ownership for years and instead pointed the
fingre of convinient scapegoats such as films, video games and rap
music.

“Problems at home, problems at school, problems at work, problems
with girl and boyfriends, difficulty getting along with other people
in general and mental illness are nothing new, and cannot be the
primary explanation for mass murders by so many minors and adults.”

No it cannot be the primary explanation for mass murders but it is a
factor and self appointed moral guardians of the US who choose to
ignore the mental and social problems many of their nation’s young
people have and pass the blame on films, video games and rap music
are doing their young people no favours at all and discouraging
their government to tackle those problems.

This latest mass murder shows that America has terrible problems
with it’s lax gun ownership laws where guns and dished out to all
and sundry. It also shows that they have young people with serious
social, mental and emotional problems which when left not delt with
blow up and turn into something like the gun tragedies which their
country has seen.
Yet groups like Morality In The Media funded and backed by powerful
and influential religious groups who’s only goal is to impose THEIR
morality on the rest of America prefer to gloss over these problems
in order to push their agenda of censorship onto the entertainments
industry.
They can carry on pointing the fingre at the media but the problems
won’t go away and more blood will be spilt and more young lives will
be destroyed!
But as long as they get everyone to believe in Jesus they probably
don’t give a fuck do they?

Kids secretary ready for pre-watershed booze ad ban

December 10, 2007

In the story about the planned government enquiry into the “harmful
effects of advertising on children Ed Balls rules out pre watershed
ban on alcohol advertising.
But it seems he is ready to call for one as he obviously has his ear
bended sideways by groups like Alcohol Concern.

From the Melon Farmers:

A Watershed for Drinks Advertising…

TV restrictions for alcohol adverts

From Brand Republic

The Children’s secretary Ed Balls is poised call for a 9pm watershed
for drinks advertising.

The move will be seen as the strongest indication yet that the
Government intends to push through the restrictive measure.

Balls is understood to have been influenced by a report by Alcohol
Concern that claims there is a spike in alcohol ads between 3pm and
5pm.

According to insiders, he has briefed national Sunday newspaper
political editors in a bid to get maximum coverage of his views on
the subject.

The drinks industry has maintained that a 9pm watershed is an
unnecessary measure as the scheduling rules around already prevents
them appearing during or around children’s programmes. They cannot
be shown at other times if the percentage of child viewers rises to
20% above the proportion of children in the general population.

“Balls is understood to have been influenced by a report by Alcohol
Concern that claims there is a spike in alcohol ads between 3pm and
5pm.”

The more influence groups like Alcohol Concern have on politicians
the more inroads they are making towards their ultimate goal of the
total banning of all alcohol adverts everywhere at any time.

As we have said before…

They get a pre watershed ban…

Then they push for total ban…

They get a total ban…

Then they push for…..PROHIBITION